Lower
Tax Rates - More Dough
The decision by the Mike Harris government to
reduce personal income taxes substantially had
the desired effect of rejuvenating Ontario’s
economy, says Bob Runciman, Leeds-Grenville MPP.
“People normally equate reducing tax rates
with reducing revenue and therefore ending up
with less money to meet the costs of providing
necessary services,” said Runciman. “That
belief, perpetuated by political opponents and
the media, is not supported by facts.
“In fact, the reverse is true.”
When the Ontario Progressive Conservatives took
office in 1995, the government was spending about
$1.2 million per hour more than it was receiving
in revenue.
“At that rate, the province was facing
bankruptcy,” said Runciman.
Keeping the Tories election promise of reducing
taxes was essential to turning around the finances
of the province.
The Harris government has made a number of tax
cuts since taking office and now the effective
personal income tax rate (for citizens in the
$30,000 to $60,000 income bracket) is 9.22 per
cent compared to 18.10 percent in 1995 _ almost
half.
Corporate tax rates have also decreased but not
as substantially. Now tax rates for general corporate
is 15.5 per cent, manufacturing and processing
11 percent and small business 6 per cent. In 1995,
these rates were general corporate 15.5 per cent,
manufacturing and processing 13.5 per cent and
small business 9 per cent.
“We believed then and we believe now, that
putting more money into the hands of individuals
and businesses, encourages economic activity,”
said Runciman. “With more money, individuals
have more ability to make their own spending decisions.
Relaxing the tax burden on business encourages
more reinvestment and expansion … and more
jobs.”
Since September 1995, Ontario has created 838,000
more jobs which represents 48.5 per cent of the
national gain.
But at what price? asks critics.
Total revenue from personal income taxes in Ontario
for the last fiscal year reached $18.6 billion
compared to $14.7 billion in the 1994-1995 fiscal
year. Other tax revenue has increased to $27.4
billion (1999-2000) from $19.8 billion in 1994-1996.
“Clearly our program of tax cuts has worked,”
said Runciman. “They have created the positive
environment for economic growth, allowed our companies
to compete on a level playing field with their
competitors, and have produced more revenue to
meet the demands of providing increased services
to our constituents.”
|